|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
St
Mary's Church Almondsbury
|
|
||||
|
|
To know God,
build up each other as Christians, and proclaim Jesus Christ as Lord to our
neighbours |
|
|||||
|
|
Home | Services | Mid-week | Children & Youth | Community | Groups | Who's
Who | Gallery | Links | Find Us |
|
|||||
|
|
THEOLOGY 1: How can
Jesus be divine and human? A
summary of the talk given by Rev John Hadley; the first in our series
entitled ÒTheology for the Layman / LaywomanÓ. |
|
|||||
|
|
Obviously, nothing could
be more utterly different than God and humanity – so
how could the two possibly come together in one person? Council of Chalcedon – doctrine
of the two natures of Christ – seems
so artificial; based on a static model that stems from later Greek philosophy Apollinaris rejected this
picture, saying that in Christ the divine Word took the place of ordinary humanity:
but was rejected as a heretic How can we find a more
helpful picture? Are God and humanity
really so utterly different? (1)
God.
Phil. 2.6, wrongly translated as e.g. Òdid not snatch at equality with
GodÓ but what it actually
says is oukh harpagmon
hegesato
to
einai isa Theou: (literally Ònot a snatching
he thought being
equal
with GodÓ, that is Òhe did not
think (that) being equal with God
(was) (a matter of) snatching/grasping..... Ò..... but he
emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, becoming in the likeness of
humans...Ó In other words,
divinity does not involve snatching, standing on a pedestal, being superior: on the contrary,
divinity involves self-emptying, humility, giving oneÕs self away. Christ was
not less divine by becoming human: on the contrary, that is how he showed his
divinity. And this is
not an isolated text: throughout the gospels, Jesus rejects the model of ÒSon
of GodÓ which involves power, difference, superiority: and accepts only that
of self-giving love (cf the Temptations, PeterÕs confession, and all the
sayings about giving up oneÕs life in order to find it, taking up oneÕs cross
etc etc). It is because he is willing
to go all the way to the cross that he is truly divine: only so can he embody
God who is the God of love. (The dispute
over the unwarranted phrase Òand the SonÓ (filioque, which the
Western church added to the Nicene Creed, is much more than a quibble about
words, because, with this addition, Jesus is left up there with God rather
than down here with us.) (2)
Humanity. Again, we assume that humanity is as different from
God as it could be. But Genesis
1 tells us that men and women are made in the image of God Some theologians say that at the
ÒFallÓ this divine image was entirely lost; but this is not our experience. Divinity still lurks in our depths,
and calls out, beckons, sings to us – an experience we know as longing
or yearning... ÒAnd so the yearning
strong with which the soul
doth long shall far out pass
the power of human telling...Ó Shakespeare
in a couple of his gloomier passages refers to ÒmanÓ as Òthis quintessence of
dustÓ and as a Òpoor, bare, forkÕd animalÓ; but in fact the very sadness of
these passages is itself a pointer to a world beyond the dust. The Oxford chemist and atheist Peter
Atkins maintains that the sciences are the only true indicators of reality:
the arts might have their place as a pleasing escape from reality, but they
are not serious academic disciplines.
Whereas I would maintain it is
the arts which, intentionally or otherwise, constantly transfigure the
merely material and point us to the spiritual reality of God. Thus a sculptor can take a familiar
shape and show us in it something we have never seen before; painters can
astonish us, with the synergy of their subject and their materials, by making
the mundane beautiful; and a musical genius like Mozart can use the simplest
combinations of notes to take us into a different world. If Atkins is right, of course, all
this remains an irrelevant distraction: but for me it is evidence (?) of the
hidden divinity which every so often breaks out Òlike shining from shook
foilÓ as Gerard Manley Hopkins puts it. And in
Christ, the Son of Man, the Second Adam, we see someone in whom our calling
to divinity has been realised.
The more human we are, the more divine we become. Those who have tried, for political
or even religious ends, to Òquench the spiritÓ, to suppress the divinity in
humans – ShakespeareÕs Malvolio, DickensÕ Mr Gradgrind, Mao Tse Tung,
Pol Pot, the Taliban (donÕt have fun, donÕt enjoy, donÕt embellish, donÕt
laugh, donÕt sing) – are on a horrific but in the end a doomed
enterprise: the cakes and ale will always reassert themselves. Perhaps this is why the Òsin against
the Holy SpiritÓ is for Jesus the ultimate blasphemy. (3)
I have described a God whose divinity is known not in aloof
grandeur but in self-giving love; and a humanity which is at its truest when
it is unearthing divinity in its heart.
Far from being polar opposites, God and humanity constantly reach out
to one another and yearn to be at one.
The New Testament is full of language along these lines: the voices
from heaven, the prayers of Jesus, and PaulÕs astonishing language of
reconciliation: Òin Christ God
was reconciling the world to himself... for our sake he made him to be sin
who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of GodÓ (2
Cor. 5.19,21). And it is
good that at the very heart of the Bible lie those few pages of mysterious
and passionate yearning which we call the Song of Songs. The coming together of God and
humanity in Christ is not an intractable proposition or a complicated
diagram, leading to a very unconvincing piece of psychology (how could
someone with two natures really be one of us?), but a love story; one which
ends, not with God grudgingly ÒadoptingÓ us his children again once Jesus has
made a suitable sacrifice for us: but with Christ welcoming us as sharers of
his sonship, of his divine humanity, in what he calls Òthe Kingdom of GodÓ. |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Contact the Church
Office Rev. Philip W. Rowe,
Vicar of Almondsbury and Olveston with Aust |
Email the Website Administrator |
|
||||